Mass communication influence our lives especially children
In recent decades, there has been considerable debate regarding the mass communication. I firmly concur with the opinion that the mass communication has a great influence on the adults and children because of the facility that it makes and the performance that it has.
To begin with, the mass communication influence children because of the facility and its enjoyment. From my personal experience, a qualitative analysis was conducted by an eminent sociologist to explore further children feel comfortable to communicate with the colleges. Final results revealed that there is a fairly clear relationship between the homework and students even though its easy use should be taken into consideration. Thus, people can be fully informed about sufficient evidence of a causal link between the facility and the number of children that inclination for the mass communication.
Furthermore, people especially children employ the mass communication to enjoy of its performance. For instance, a quantitative research was carried out at the Melbourne university concerning the telephone, tv, radio and others devices. Hence, perhaps if the scientific research is significantly correlated with speaking all over the world, accessing with high speed, the preliminary findings will be closely related to both the high quality of communicating with video and images.
To recapitulate, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to the opinion that the mass communication influence the people' lives specifically young children and youth due to its performance and facilities. Moreover, not only should national institutions develop strategies, but also they should formulate them to utilise the mass communication in their life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 5.75862068966 330% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67567567568 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27546505214 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606177606178 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7785357291 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.636363636 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354659015892 0.242375264174 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142699057806 0.0925447433944 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119635654896 0.071462118173 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215520904661 0.151781067708 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482963388809 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.