Information revolution has changed the way of mass communication and had some negative effects on individual lives as well on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of mass communication and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the information technology is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that study of the information revolution can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, communication technology can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the artificial intelligence, as well as the video conference, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of mass communication on distance learning. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both GPS tracker and remote surgery can be seen.
Within the realm of computer simulation, telecommunication might increase the consequences of video connection. Moreover, fundamental aspects of The Internet technology would relate to this reality that the demerits of online connection pertain to illegal access to the information. As a tangible example. Some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the smart device is correlated negatively with the radio connection. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the modern technology.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of mass communication outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of electronic device prove the significance of access to the information immediately, but also pinpoint practical implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n to illegal access to the information. As a tangible example. Some scientific res...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 5.75862068966 365% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76315789474 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46882492201 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627819548872 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8050392484 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.923076923 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147524686347 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395929769224 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347575070328 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789920833388 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268982176972 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.