It is believed that some people are born with creativity and specific talents. However, it's sometimes claimed that taught developed creativity, and any child can become good sports person or musician. Discuss the two ideas.
Recently, the phenomenon of being born with creativity and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of having a creative talent is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that promoting skills by education can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, having a creative and special talent can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the creative mind, as well as inborn talent, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of taught creativity on becoming a good musician. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both acquiring skill and promoting creativity apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, training to develop creativity might increase the consequences of being a prosperous person. Moreover, fundamental aspects of having a creative idea could relate to this reality that merits of frequent practice pertain to abundant talent. As a tangible example undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the inborn skill is correlated negatively with general intelligence. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the creative scheme.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of having specific talents far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of raising the intellectual ability to prove the significance of being an accomplished person, but also pinpoint practical implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'developing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: developing
... Within the realm of science, training to develop creativity might increase the consequen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nt practice pertain to abundant talent. As a tangible example undertaken by a pres...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54710144928 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.171999539 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626811594203 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4677753067 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.583333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178869924157 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602085182918 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335684776666 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997916903484 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392998135373 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.