It is usually foolish to get married before completing your studies and getting established in
a good job. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of marriage and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the number of financial difficulties is highly rewarding, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the full-time job can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, marital status can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that housewives, as well as n, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered a dependent wife. Thus, beneficially ramifications of family relationships and completing study apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the married life, a successful marriage might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the low-income family. Moreover, fundamental aspects of separations relate to this reality that demerits of single-parent pertain to two income family. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of a lovely couple is correlated negatively with sensible marriage. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of a painful divorce.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of a happy marriage far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of polygamy prove the significance of monogamy, but also pinpoint bigamy implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ated negatively with sensible marriage. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65587044534 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3275362508 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68016194332 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8939922842 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.416666667 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0439629087247 0.242375264174 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0146450696046 0.0925447433944 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0232364393858 0.071462118173 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0226090813131 0.151781067708 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00691070575554 0.0609392437508 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.