It is usually foolish to get married before completing your studies and getting established in a good job. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of marriage before completing studies and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that early marriage is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that getting established can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, education system can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that divorce, as well as acquiring a job, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the financial problem. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both delayed marriage and child adoption can be seen.
Within the realm of possibility, couples might increase the consequences of struggling financially. Moreover, fundamental aspects of settling down relate to this reality that the demerits of finding a good job pertain to have a significant degree of education. As a tangible example, a scientific study undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of career is correlated negatively with a successful marriage. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of a stable job.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of getting married before finishing studies far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of focusing on studies prove the significance of the high level of education, but also pinpoint stable job implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-03 | Mahdi_Farhani | 85 | view |
- People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, whitewater river rafting etc. Do you support? If yes, why and if not, why? 11
- Vegetarianism is more ethical than eating meat.” Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 80
- What is the best invention of last 100 years; the computer, antibiotics, airplane, and explainwhy? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your ownknowledge or experience. 11
- Do you think English will remain a global language despite globalization? Discuss you views with examples. 88
- It is usually foolish to get married before completing your studies and getting established ina good job. Do you agree or disagree? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53307392996 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21974032065 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669260700389 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5359680472 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187139909652 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546277720113 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530214400076 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102724702841 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661446329648 0.0609392437508 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.