Recently, the phenomenon of the marriage before completing studies and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the number of the two-income family is highly rewarding, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the full-time job can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, marital status can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that a single-parent, as well as getting divorced, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered a painful divorce. Thus, beneficial ramifications of the independent life and job apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the married life, completing study might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of a well-paid job. Moreover, fundamental aspects of low-income family relate to this reality that demerits of being out of work pertain to financial difficulties. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of financial support is correlated negatively with a good job. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of an education system.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the high level of education far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of stable job prove the significance of the early marriage, but also pinpoint successful marriage implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54580152672 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25593101378 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656488549618 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7788704907 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.083333333 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140251414122 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429969537228 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467522522348 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693772311695 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228272304174 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.