Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work. Some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases.

Essay topics:

Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work. Some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases.

Recently, the phenomenon of some people and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of young people is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that concentration on study can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay. From a social standpoint, concentration on work can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of activities problem, as well as volunteering, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered intelligent people. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both spending time for study and funny activities apparently can be seen. Within the realm of science, balanced activities might increase the consequences of personal experience. Moreover, fundamental aspects of educated people could relate to this reality that the demerits of focusing on work pertain to traveling. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of private experience is correlated negatively with uneducated people. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of hard working. To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of good experience far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of sport activities prove the significance of young people, but also pinpoint hard studying implications.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-22 Alireza.r.68 88 view
2019-10-07 mndpsngh21 80 view
2019-10-07 mndpsngh21 77 view
2019-08-31 Ekta shah 72 view
2019-08-08 daniellima126 11 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user rezai2003 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60557768924 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27002088961 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657370517928 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.779556425 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232565040557 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686079195361 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485427331137 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232565040557 0.151781067708 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.