Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work. Some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases.

Essay topics:

Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work. Some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases.

Recently, the phenomenon of work concentration and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that energy putting can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a general standpoint, international traveling and volunteering can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.

Within a realm of a public arena, concentration about study concentration might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-22 Alireza.r.68 88 view
2019-10-07 mndpsngh21 80 view
2019-10-07 mndpsngh21 77 view
2019-08-31 Ekta shah 72 view
2019-08-08 daniellima126 11 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user rezai2003 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 1207.87684729 88% => OK
No of words: 182.0 242.827586207 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86813186813 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.92707691288 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4500944615 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.708791208791 0.580463131201 122% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9054437946 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103138646679 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354216351092 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028270706826 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642362980082 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176368757316 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.22 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.