Lots of scientists agreed that human activities increase global temperatures. Do you agree? Please give solutions for global warming.
The important effect of lots of scientists agrees that human activities increase global temperature which was always debatable has now become more controversal. The substantial influence of human activities increase the global warming has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on recent year on global temperature. It can be agreed that excessive human daily activities increase the global temperature which is very dangerous for the earth.
At the outset, there are numerous reason why global temperature increase but the most conspicuous one steam's from the fact that human activities increase the temperature as a result the temperature of earth increase and effect to the human, animals and plants. As an illustration, a current study shows in America ten people, more than one hundred animals died due to the high temperature which creates the human. In addition, human daily activities should be controlled in their daily life. Thus, people should be aware about the increase global temperature and should stop the deforestation, stop the more new housing and proper disposal of waste materials etc.
Another key of justification for upholding the notion is that human daily activities increase the global temperature so it will harm to whole nature, people, animals and plants. For instance, people should start the new plantation on the vacant land, people should more concern about the cutting the trees, they should stop to cut down the tree. Thus, people should focus to decrease the global temperature by controlling their harmful activities.
From what has been discussed above it can be concluded that the impact of human activities increase the global warming is prominent and people should discussed in a group and discuss about to control the global temperature, starting the plantation, save the trees, save the animals and birds.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, for instance, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38513513514 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76858881073 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493243243243 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5251179707 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.909090909 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298083453923 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141972903484 0.0925447433944 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974415385265 0.071462118173 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206877128529 0.151781067708 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117666717795 0.0609392437508 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.