The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they shouldn’twaste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech mediasuch as computer software, videos and DVDs. To what extent do you agree ordisagree with this statement

Essay topics:

The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they shouldn’t
waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media
such as computer software, videos and DVDs. To what extent do you agree or
disagree with this statement?

Today, the fact of using technology-based devices in libraries and its corresponding impact has been long marked by controversy among people particularly, librarian authorities. While some of them claim that providing hi-tech media for libraries is pointless, I inclined to believe that those libraries which benefit from such cutting-edge technologies are gaining more popularity, so I completely disagree with that idea.

To begin with, nowadays, with the emerge of technology, libraries should benefit other aspects of media such as DVD, Electronic books and some other kind of multimedia learning devices. Therefore, governors should take the responsibility of providing sufficient equipment for libraries. For example, by giving the adequate budget to libraries, we benefit a hi-tech atmosphere in them which in turn, can bring about a contemporary way of learning for both new generations and old citizens. As it clearly reveals, investing money to make libraries equipped with modern media systems can have significant effect on both educated and ordinary citizens.

Moreover, new media introduce new ways of learning for young people who are spending a great deal of time with their paper book on schools and universities. So this technological devices can cultivate their mind and alter their old-fashioned learning methods. As it is obvious, libraries which provide high-tech devices and media, can help new generation to lead a better life owing to cultivating their mind.

As a conclusion, I would like to reaffirm that, whereas there are numerous arguments for the both ideas, I am firmly convinced that the advantages of making libraries well-equipped with all varieties of medium far outweigh its drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-02-10 ELNJ 77 view
2018-01-28 Darsh365patel 77 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user ELNJ :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...idea. To begin with, nowadays, with the emerge of technology, libraries should benefit...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, kind of, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57575757576 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10908943233 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632575757576 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.3378894642 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.2 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.25397266985 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147212427414 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624648957897 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315945397357 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877864031712 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324004784495 0.0609392437508 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.