One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is to invite employees in companies' decision-making process. There is a widespread worry that involving employees in making a strategic decision will contribute to a myriad of problems in any company. In my opinion, this apprehension is unwarranted and should be rejected.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that involving employees in decision making organisations can make a better and wiser decision. Not only do company get better ideas and suggestions from the employee that contributes a great deal to productivity and efficiency but employees also feel privileged when their opinion and suggestions are counted as a good value. Needless to say, all these merits stand companies in good stead, as far as the good working environment is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that companies can save time and money when they invite staff in the decision-making process. For instance, there are a number of researchers by the various governmental bodies that show that companies accelerate their annual growth by five times when the employees are engaged in making decision from strategic decision to day-to-day decision. Besides, many companies offer incentives to their employees at the exchange of top suggestions and ideas. Hence, why many companies are in favour of involving employees in decision making policy.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of taking the employee in decision making are too great to ignore.
- Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- You are given climate as the field of study. Which area will you prefer? Explain why you picked up the particular area for your study? 11
- Marketing strategy for big companies should be placed on offer and discounts, and in what ways this impact on their reputation. 85
- do you think that formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledge at school? 85
- Successful sportsstars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...good working environment is concerned. Another pivotal aspect of this argument ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, so, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26459143969 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00699422383 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517509727626 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9596395864 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309538985738 0.242375264174 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132622810195 0.0925447433944 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907622393052 0.071462118173 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187399105719 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664829219994 0.0609392437508 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.