One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is offering short-term discount in marketing strategies of companies. There is a widespread concern that an increased number of promotion and discount strategies will hardly meet companies' long-term goal. In my opinion, this apprehension is warranted and merits serious considerations.
There is a number of arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that discounted commodity prices entice customer into purchasing product in an effort to augment profit at the expense of quality. Not only do big brands like Samsung and Apple keep their prices high to maintain company's image but they also avoid discounts and promotions to any customers. We can find overwhelming evidence in support the fact that there is a negative correlation between offering discount and companies' reputation. Needless to say all these demerits have a far-reaching impact on making company's growth.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that companies will lose their regular customers when they introduce discount strategies. Besides, the trust and faith on the goods and services determine by recurrence of customer not the price of goods. For example, there are a good deal of research by various governmental bodies that show that companies providing heavy discount on product often fail to achieve the mission in the long term. Hence, it is apparent why many companies are against providing discounts.
In view of the argument outlined above, one can conclude that despite some benefits the drawbacks of offer and discounts are indeed too dire to ignore.
- Marketing strategy for big companies should be placed on offer and discounts, and in what ways this impact on their reputation. 85
- do you think that formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledge at school? 85
- Marketing strategy for big companies should be placed on offer and discounts, and in what ways this impact on their reputation. 85
- Education is the biggest barrier in my learning- Einstein. What do you mean by this? And do you think Einstein was correct in saying that. 55
- Is that law can change the human behaviour? 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
...of goods. For example, there are a good deal of research by various governmental bod...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, so, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32046332046 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85528479706 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625482625483 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6128007458 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.833333333 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195374335104 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067553598085 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391665836448 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103207434469 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415318610888 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.