in many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society?
Recently, the issue of elderly population growth has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "Does this increasing trend have positive or negative impacts on our society?". Whereas it is a widely held view that increasing proportion of older people can have deterimental effects on the society, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, the aging population problem is bound up inextricably with pensioners, which indicates that they lead to both increasing the generation gap and lack of workforce. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between the working age and retirement age as well as an exponential increase in the unemployment rate. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented so far supports the contention that likelihood of demographic charactristics of the society is correlated positively with not only social service providers but also a drop in fertility and decreasing the birth rate.
Within the realm of economy, without the slightest doubt, rising elderly population attribute to more financial pressures on government, in that it would come down to pension commitments, health insurance costs, and extra nursing costs. A salient example of such attribution is a holistic pension scheme, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take the working population for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint the labore market problems. Hence, it is reasonable the pivotal role of negative effects of population aging.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes, "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that increasing number of older people in the society can have some serious negative impacts on the future of our society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-18 | neelu sharma | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | farshid2370 | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | farshid2370 | 55 | view |
| 2018-09-22 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
| 2018-09-22 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting.Agree or disagree? 88
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 88
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 88
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 85
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ing goes, 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 304.0 242.827586207 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58881578947 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14216029386 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644736842105 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.4626363683 50.4703680194 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.454545455 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6363636364 20.9669160288 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194854972004 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635731489084 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698190381971 0.071462118173 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118995728623 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092557341719 0.0609392437508 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.