Many young people nowadays are imitating celebrities in sports and movies. In your opinion, is this good or bad? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of Youth imitating celebrities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of media culture is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded truly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that following celebrities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, following trends can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that interpersonal relationships, as well as social skills, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered extrovert activities advantages. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both participating in social media and idealizing a celebrity apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of culture, imitating famous people might increase the consequences of lost identity. Moreover, fundamental aspects of individualism relate to this reality that the demerits of blind acceptance of behavior pertain to self-destructive actions. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of social media addiction is correlated negatively with terminal depression. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of young people acting similar to celebrities.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of celebrity imitating far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of being trendy prove the significance of social awareness, but also pinpoint having high energy implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87159533074 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36893532203 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669260700389 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3796865761 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117429693927 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387401755636 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0187701110885 0.071462118173 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0630588177788 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175649033483 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.01 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.