The mass media including TV, radio, and newspaper can influence in young generation life. What is your opinion?
Recently, the impact of mass media in young generation has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the Pros and Cons of mass media in adolescent generation?" Whereas it is a widely held view that mass media do not have effect on youngsters, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, young generation is bound up inextricably with choosing wrong role model, which indicates they lead to both misbehavior and antisocial behavior. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between Television channels and social norms as well as an exponential increase in crime rate. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of grown up environment is correlated positively with not only mass media but also personal traits.
Within the realm of psychological, without the slightest doubt, mental health attribute to entertainment activities, in that it would come down to responsibility, standard of behavior, and objective life. A salient example of such attribution is newspaper articles, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take false information for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint criminal movies in increasing juvenile crime problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of parent, society, and government to provide beneficial TV programs.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that mass media can have a strong influence in young generation. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-01 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | mojtaba1980 | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-13 | a_nazeran | 85 | view |
| 2018-07-13 | a_nazeran | 85 | view |
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 77
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 77
- Sports and games create disturbance in students’ life because students cannot fully concentrate on their studies. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 85
- Should company top level authorities take employees’ suggestions while making any decisions? 11
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them. Give your opinion and discuss your views. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to wrong'
Suggestion: to wrong
... is bound up inextricably with choosing wrong role model, which indicates they lead t...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61433447099 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22252986257 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682593856655 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.1223875596 50.4703680194 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.545454545 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221477133996 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568627708251 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712916163423 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119272415452 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067269961594 0.0609392437508 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 22.0 9.94827586207 221% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.