Medical advancements have increased human life expectancy. While most people may believe that prolonging human life is a blessing, others believe that it’s a curse. This essay will discuss two reasons why increasing the average human life expectancy through medical technology is a curse.
Firstly, the use of medical technology to prolong life is a burden to sustain. Continuing medical treatments can easily deplete resources. For example, a family with a cancer patient may opt to prolong the patient’s life but may lose all of their resources because of it. Thus, medical technology is unsustainable.
Secondly, scientific researches done in laboratories in pursuit of medical breakthroughs are usually unethical. Animals and humans are often used for these experiments. This is an attack to animal and human rights. An example is the use of Filipino children to test the new dengue vaccine which proved to be lethal. Increasing human life expectancy at the expense of tested animals and humans are unethical.
To conclude, this essay discussed why extending human life through medical advancements is a curse. Prolonging life through advanced medical treatments is unsustainable and unethical. In my opinion, increasing human life expectancy through medical technology should be stopped.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.75862068966 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 198.0 242.827586207 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63636363636 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05558477321 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 139.433497537 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.5024630542 63% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9420034277 50.4703680194 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.4 104.977214359 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2 20.9669160288 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 2.75862068966 362% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425702216576 0.242375264174 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167081359246 0.0925447433944 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119856166756 0.071462118173 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270569614875 0.151781067708 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798476280043 0.0609392437508 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 41.36 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.54 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.3980295567 69% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.