As commercialization and capitalism grow stronger in the world today, many businesses invest on becoming larger and provide wider coverage and such is the business model of a large shopping mall. While most people widely accept the conveniences and variety large shopping malls can offer, others still believe that we should be loyal to traditional and local small shops. This essay will further elaborate we should patronize small shops over large shopping malls.
Firstly, large shopping malls provide better access to a wide variety of products and services. Shopping malls offer the convenience of finding everything under one roof whether it's food, shoes, clothes, or services such as medical, dental and pet care. An example is the largest shopping mall in Manila where you can find all the necessities of life. In this regard, shopping malls may seem superior over small shops but this will kill the local economy.
Secondly, and on the other hand, small shops provide the quality and credibility that large shopping malls cannot offer. Small shops are usually long standing businesses passed on from one generation to another which helps maintain the quality standards that earlier craftsmen and experts of the business built at the onset. An example is the custom shoe store that I always go to because I am sure that they will always provide quality shoes that would last me a very long time. Thus, loyalty to local small shops will help bring innovation and craftsmanship to the next level.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the redeeming features of small shops over large shopping malls. In my opinion, governments should increase their support to local and small shops to encourage entrepreneurship and vocational trades.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'generation to'.
Suggestion: generation to
...ng standing businesses passed over from generation to generation to maintain the quality standards that ear...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, still, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26545454545 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64194769125 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5616953501 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.384615385 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.25397266985 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412076526091 0.242375264174 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175439701587 0.0925447433944 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809786077509 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282496178324 0.151781067708 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459016919945 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.