One of the conspicuous trends in today's world is the increasing life expectancy due to advanced medical technology. This phenomenon is always debatable and now becomes more controversial. While some people regard it as a curse, as far as I am concerned, I agreed with the opinion that this medical technology is a blessing. This article will elaborate both sides and thus lead to a constructive conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why some people regard it as a curse. The most dominant one lies in the fact that we are encountering an aging world and the cost paid for the elder continue to increase in last decade. As an illustration, the government in Shanghai has to allocate 5 times of tax in pension than in five years ago.
Nevertheless, there is a deluge of arguments in favor of my stance. The most prominent stems from the fact that extended life makes most of human beings happier than before. Furthermore, after people retire, they deserve to enjoy the rest of their life in such as traveling or dancing. For example, travelers from China rise 50 percent in the past three years while 80 percent of them are above 65. Therefore, medical technology is a gift for us.
Considering all the substantial insights outlined above, we can safely reach an conclusion that although some people regard longer life expectancy as a curse, it has more advantages than disadvantages.
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse? 55
- Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree. 77
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse? 52
- Many university students live with their families while others live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages both situations? 77
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...hts outlined above, we can safely reach an conclusion that although some people re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87866108787 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87338964653 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610878661088 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4859922262 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6923076923 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169154174805 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525801493574 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595438132986 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890968538729 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421008516127 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.