Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse?

One of the conspicuous trends in today's world is the increasing life expectancy due to advanced medical technology. This phenomenon is always debatable and now becomes unprecedented controversial. While some people regard longevity as a burden on society, I agreed with the opinion that this medical technology is a blessing. This article will elaborate both positive and negative impacts of medical technology and thus lead to a constructive conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why some people defend medical technology. The most dominant one lies in the fact that we are encountering an aging world while the cost paid for the elder continue to increase in last decade. As an illustration, the government in Shanghai has to allocate 5 times of tax in pension than in five years ago.
Nevertheless, there is a deluge of arguments in favor of my stance. The most prominent stems from the fact that extended life makes most of human beings happier than before. Furthermore, after people retire, they deserve to enjoy the rest of their life in such as traveling or dancing. For example, travelers from China increase 50 percent in the past three years while 80 percent of them are above 65 years old.
Considering all the substantial insights outlined above, we can safely reach an conclusion that despite some drawbacks, the benefits of the medical technology which is responsible for the improvement of human's life cannot be ignored.

Votes
Average: 5.2 (4 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...hts outlined above, we can safely reach an conclusion that despite some drawbacks,...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, thus, while, as to, for example, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12605042017 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90027989562 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63025210084 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6956863671 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234362579928 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703082048927 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622943893742 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132659071947 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598330975805 0.0609392437508 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.