Medical technology can increase life expectancy. Is it a blessing or a curse?
The acute importance of medical technology whether it is a blessing or curse has always been debatable, upsurge ample spatial arguments resulting in further controversial fervor and spark numerous contentions. However, I undisputedly and unambiguously affirm that medical technology, being a blessing, plays an important role in our life. Nevertheless, this essay will colossally elaborate on the disseminating assertions of medical technology and provide a well-weighed conclusion derived from the bonafide conformation.
To begin with, being imperative in nature, the significance of medical technology is to increase the life expectancy of all human beings by eradicating all the diseases to let the society thrive unprecedentedly. In fact, the evolution of modern technology has adapted advanced perceptions and concepts while delivering medical facilities to all humans. Moreover, despite the new disease that becomes both a challenge and a threat to the existence of humans, new research and invention of the latest medical technology help the industry to give them tough resistance. In addition to it, the globalization of modern medical technology has endorsed the facilities to reach every individual within no time. Thus, this increases life expectancy.
On the other hand, in pledging allegiance to society, modern medical technology serves as the main academic source for the research and analysis for the new prospective medical students. New modern hospitals cum research centers equipped with advanced medical research facilities become academic mansions for medical learners across the globe to discuss and innovate new operational technologies. Meanwhile, this congregation generates multifarious learning resources for various other professionals globally for any medical consultations. Eventually, this helps to innovate and invent new medical techniques to make humans' lives better.
Therefore, in conclusion, I strongly believe that despite the new emerging challenges to society, modern medical technology acts as a blessing to humans' life expectancy that we all are proud of.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-29 | mohammadsabet | 77 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | Nina Tsarevich | 80 | view |
| 2022-07-15 | Nawal Fatima | 72 | view |
| 2022-07-15 | Nawal Fatima | 77 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | Alireza.r.m | 85 | view |
- A business whether big or small is to maximize profit. Do you agree with that? Give your opinion. 85
- The university experience is more important than a university’s degree. Some people argue that university life is much more important than an educational degree in the job market. Do you agree or not agree? 88
- Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues, such as environmental problems, that we should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding? 88
- A business whether big or small is to maximize profit. Do you agree with that? Give your opinion. 85
- Hosting sporting events such as the Olympics and the World Cup can bring benefits to the host countries. How far do you agree with this statement? Use your own examples to support it. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fe expectancy that we all are proud of.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1207.87684729 150% => OK
No of words: 305.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94098360656 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2259262819 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593442622951 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 379.143842365 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1395584442 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.384615385 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.25397266985 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338595899458 0.242375264174 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126808928359 0.0925447433944 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713408914307 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20367103896 0.151781067708 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593900481404 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 11.5310837438 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.