Medical technology can increase life expectancy. Is it a blessing or curse?
one of the most conspicious trends of today's world is the clossal upsurge in the number of increasing expectation through medical field. There is a wide spread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one's life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preporderant one is the medical technology can not only contribute to increase expectation. Thanks to the wide range of advantages being offered by medical technology, not only one can benefit more when its come to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and standard of life with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of better life is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proportion is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follow such a system, can one broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibilities, dedication and preserverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of medical technology.
In view of the arguments outline above, one can conclude thet, the benefits of medical technology are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
one of the most conspicious trends of today...
^^^
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ll only lead to a myriad of concerns in ones life. However, I do not entirely accept...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96412556054 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89046761484 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596412556054 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0744069111 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.636363636 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237828173957 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889061150299 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877590781822 0.071462118173 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142771226804 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629352246554 0.0609392437508 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.