Medical technology helps to live long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind?
Surely, there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed dramatically. A quick reflection on typical day revels has been the one of most medical technology topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analyze and explain whether it is a curse or blessing for our mankind.
To begin, with the advancement in medical technology, our society has discovered the cure of much incurable deadly disease. For example we will say that many people were facing death in absence of any treatment. There was no treatment of diseases like malaria, cancer in ancient times. Also, medical science has proven discourse in the field of job sectors. This is because companies prefer experienced staff instead of young trainers, which ultimately results in snatching away of bread and butter of younger generation.
If we talk about blessing or mankind, now in modern generation there is a cure of deadly diseases like cancer or malaria. People enjoy their lifestyle easily. People get their job easily. Their life is healthy. With help of medical they sustain a long life. People have more value in their society.
In conclusion, we can see that medical technology is helpful for living a long and healthy. Therefore, its pros are far more than its cons.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 1207.87684729 89% => OK
No of words: 215.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02790697674 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6325170512 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632558139535 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.5024630542 63% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7947860906 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.5625 104.977214359 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4375 20.9669160288 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322169714655 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087685903863 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109999259552 0.071462118173 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17397119518 0.151781067708 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610240155486 0.0609392437508 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 12.6369458128 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.9458128079 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.3980295567 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.