Recently, the phenomenon of medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of medicines is highly beneficial, such issues are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the medical technology can be plus, I will analyze throughout this essay.
From the social stand point, medical treatment for sickness persons can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the relief quickly from disease, as well as relief pain are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when i was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered health maintaining. Thus the beneficial ramifications of stress relief and mentally strong apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of health problems, some times medical treatments might increase the consequences of side effects. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of responsibility of medicines for human's life expectancy relate to this reality that the demerits of becoming neglect health pertain to damage the humans life. As a tangible example, some scientific research has undertaken by prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of medical technology correlated negatively with dangerous health hazards.
To conclude, while there is several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of medical allowances far outweigh its drawbacks, not only do the advantages prove the significance of healthy environment. But also pinpoint technology implications.
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? what are the reasons for that? 85
- The mass media including TV, radio, newspaper influence our society and shape our opinions and characters. What is your opinion? 88
- some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Dicuss both these views and give yo 56
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- Company’s top level authorities should get their Employees in decision-making process. Discus Organizations involve employees in decision making process of their products and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...dical technology is responsible for the humans life expectancy has sparked a heated de...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...p. According to my own experience, when i was a university student, I performed a...
^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nt which discovered health maintaining. Thus the beneficial ramifications of stress ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ng neglect health pertain to damage the humans life. As a tangible example, some scien...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78542510121 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12615629577 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651821862348 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4521823272 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.909090909 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21757112873 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796117775206 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890257264059 0.071462118173 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123133305702 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661169901483 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.