more information is available online and library books has no place.agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of online library and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance complex procedure is highly benefits, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and concequently positive by a substantial of individuals. I am inclined to belive that online teaching can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, online publications can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricablely bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Hence, beneficial ramifications of both improving ITskills and public education apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, online information might increase the consequences e-book. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by prestigious university has asserted that downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with replacing book. Thus, it is correct to presume the preconceive notion of book availablity.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that benefits of information accessing far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ng book. Thus, it is correct to presume the preconceive notion of book availablity. To conclud...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83856502242 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28150024864 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.708520179372 0.580463131201 122% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9956753543 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.363636364 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125061493826 0.242375264174 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465806994452 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523505284305 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692745508928 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050140762432 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.43 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.