Most high level jobs are done by men. Should government encourage that a certain percentage of these jobsbe reserved for women? What is your opinion?
The important of most high level jobs are done by men. Governments should encourage that a certain percentage of these jobs be reserved for women which was always debatable has now become more controversal. The substantial influence of most high level jobs are done by men. Government should encourage that a certain percentage of these jobs be reserved for women has sparked the controversy over the potential inpact of these trend in recent year. It can be said that, governmental high level level jobs for women for carrer development.
At the outset, there are numerous reason why Governments should encourage that a certain percentage of high level jobs be reserved for women but the most conspicious on stem's from the fact that high level jobs for women in government sector will helps to motivate womens. As an illustration, a women president of nepal Mrs Bidhya bhandhari working in a government sector she is popular in all over the world. In addition, women working in a high level of government jobs help to grow women empowerment. Thus government should reserved certain percentage of high level jobs for womens social growth.
Neverthless, there remain same drawbacks which can certainly overwhlem the potential influence of government should encourage high level jobs reserved for women but the most alaraming one is rooted in the fact that some high level jobs should be reserved from governments for men gender equality. For instance in a hospital there should be male nurse for male patients.
From what has been discussed above it can be concluded that the impact of government should encourage that a certain percentage of high level jobs be reserved for female is prominent, although the way of men should encourage most of high level of jobs by government should be well handled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 470, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...end in recent year. It can be said that, governmental high level level jobs for w...
^^
Line 1, column 490, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: level
...It can be said that, governmental high level level jobs for women for carrer development. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he outset, there are numerous reason why Governments should encourage that a cert...
^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...obs for women in government sector will helps to motivate womens. As an illustration,...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
... motivate womens. As an illustration, a women president of nepal Mrs Bidhya bhandhari...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nt jobs help to grow women empowerment. Thus government should reserved certain perc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Neverthless, there remain same drawbacks which can certainly overwhlem the potent...
^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld be reserved from governments for men gender equality. For instance in a hospi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07382550336 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73901983003 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.406040268456 0.580463131201 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.170212693 50.4703680194 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 7.25397266985 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.648319252524 0.242375264174 267% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.329038408203 0.0925447433944 356% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131813450343 0.071462118173 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.488888693487 0.151781067708 322% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734788824068 0.0609392437508 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.32886699507 90% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.