Some people say that you can learn more about another country by watching television programmes and films about it than by actually visiting it. How true is this statement? Is there anything you can learn about another country by visiting it that cannot learn by watching programmes and films about it? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own experience.
It might be said that learning about another country via social media is more beneficial than visiting it. It appears that it can be a reasonable theory because of some reasons that I will explain in this essay.
Firstly, technology is developing day to day in the modern world. the use of technological advances such as social media is the best way to save time and money while the latest information about a country could be gained easily. This means that if people are needed to learn about other countries, they must travel to them and they have to spend much time and money to obtain the required experience. Thus, this way is not economical at all. In addition, the second and perhaps most significant benefit of the use of educational programmes and films is to gain information perfectly. In other words, people during a travel would not be able to learn whatever is related to a country such as the culture or the financial conditions. For instance, people who intend to emigrate to another country are able to learn about all aspects of the country by various programmes and films in terms of job opportunities, the education system, and the cost of living which all are essential information for emigrants.
It is true that visiting countries can be really helpful because individuals would have a chance to talk to the citizens of the country face to face. Despite this, the modern life does not permit human to experience everything personally because the world is extremely extensive and the time is limited.
To conclude, it seems to me that people are able to learn about another country by television's programmes and films more than visiting it due to the fact that there are a lot of limits in today's life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-11 | Mehdi.Babaie | 70 | view |
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. Given time, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Analyze both sides of this argument. 72
- An old friendis coming to town and has invited you to go to the cinema Write to your friend In your letter Explain that you are unable to come Find out how long your friend is stayingin town Arrange a suitable time to meet 78
- You have recently ordered an item from the Internet, but are not happy with the purchase. Write to the company. In your letterDescribe what you purchasedExplain why you are not happy with the purchaseTell them what you would like them to do about the situ 87
- The difference in age between parents and their children has increased compared to the past Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 76
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. Given time, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...eloping day to day in the modern world. the use of technological advances such as s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, really, second, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, such as, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78666666667 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65060999269 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516666666667 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.2887925191 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392193222509 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131194857047 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118040869981 0.0667982634062 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258184225686 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913844906223 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.