Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of being responsible for the behavior of the children and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that Parents being responsible for the behavior of the children can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, Parent’s responsibility for the children behavior can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, being responsible for the children behavior might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of Children behavior or parents responsibility far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
- Should wealthy nations help poor countries with food and education, or is it the responsibility of poor nations to improve their condition? 85
- It has recently been suggested that the classical, or "dead", languages Latin and Greek should be re- introduced into the school curriculum. Those that oppose the idea claim that the ancient languages are of no practical use and no help in getting a job 88
- Whether design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 77
- Do you think people need to learn how to spend their money from early ages at school? 88
- Many companies involve employees in decision-making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82879377432 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34512693097 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634241245136 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0971435335 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.181818182 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240704508874 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894274677843 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921824684664 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145823005683 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402073619597 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.