Parents should be held legally responsible for their children acts. What is your opinion. Support it with your personal examples.
The importance of parents responsibility for their children which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion the farmer proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this arguments but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that children spend time with their parents. Consequently, they learn language, manners and good behavior from their parents. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that parents have legal responsibility of upbringing child and they cannot avoid that. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoints, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that children are very close to parents and parents closely monitor child’s growth. Besides, parents are pretty much aware of positive and negative aspects of child. Hence, it is apparent why many are against of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that parents play critical and vital role in child’s upbringing. Therefore, they are also responsible for child’s act and their future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-24 | Deepkaur123 | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | Navjotkaur56 | 77 | view |
- science and mathematics subject is important for students 75
- the importance of cars and airplane in modern life. 65
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children acts. What is your opinion. Support it with your personal examples. 80
- should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner 55
- tourism in under developed countries 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...of reasons which will further elaborate this arguments but the most preponderant one...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, so, therefore, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4170212766 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83426617225 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8787937321 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9230769231 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0769230769 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167920225232 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580163488858 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484585772026 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999293297825 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199103588877 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.