environmental pollution can be changed by government
The importance of environmental pollution can be changed by government which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the negative impact of this trend and thus will lead to be a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that environmental pollution to be managed by government and rules followed to be other people so decrease the environmental pollution. Consequently, environmental pollution increase day by day so government should take actions. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that government should take rules and regulations thus will aware of the people. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more demerits but one of the crucial effects is that environmental pollution is too alarming to be managed by governments. Besides, government should take actions they can decrease to be daily environmental pollution. Hence, it is apparent why many are against of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the drawbacks of environmental pollution is to alarming to a managed by government level are indeed too dire to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-24 | topraveesh | 80 | view |
| 2022-05-24 | sandeep.daksha@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2022-04-15 | ots1 | 77 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 72 | view |
| 2021-05-23 | hang9815 | 72 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.356 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10566192622 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7115862944 50.4703680194 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.583333333 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435255603569 0.242375264174 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150552866375 0.0925447433944 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130124566838 0.071462118173 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27649336099 0.151781067708 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323015982434 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.