It is a foolish idea to get married before finishing the study and settling down. To what extent do you agree to disagree?
Recently, getting married time has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question, "What step can be taken to tackle this challenge?" Whereas it is a widely held view marriage before settling down is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the married standpoint, the idea developments are bound up inextricably with divorce policies, which indicates they lead to both study progress and state-of-the-art technologies. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between globalization and financial problem crisis as well as an exponential increase in happy marriage achievements. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the occurring marital life is correlated positively with not only irreversible changes but also adverse outcomes.
Within the realm of life science, without the slightest doubt, efficient education systems attribute to alternative hypotheses, in that it would come down to government intervention, mentally implications, and marital institutions. A salient example of such attribution is a non-governmental organization, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take economy planning improvements for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint face problems. Likewise, hardly had they confine their attention to allocate time, primary needs, and even income. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of systematic changes.
To conclude, as for my self, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I highly agree that be ready for marriage before finishing study is high importance. However, we perceive that the benefit to hindsight, the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83859649123 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36660404209 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.712280701754 0.580463131201 123% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.9866838007 50.4703680194 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.272727273 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145926645913 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371957704587 0.0925447433944 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051336705186 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796204632608 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450133600543 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.94827586207 216% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.