people treat their birds
The importance of these people treat their birds, cats, or other animals as members of their family which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the latter proposition to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reason which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that many people have a close relationship pets. Consequently, mostly people focus in the pets because carefully for home. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that these people treat their birds, cats, or other animals as members of their family. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some merits but one of the crucial effects that people good treat is all animals because mostly people like in the birds. Besides, animals is very sweet and cuteness, birds, cats, dogs, and other animals as members of their family. Hence, it is apparent why many are favor of this trend.
According to the aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits many people have a close relationship with their pets are indeed too great to ignore.
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples. 11
- the world s governments and organisation are facing a lot of issues 11
- Technological access to online music and like should be free or paid. 77
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops . 77
- The different methods students using to achieve information. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06504065041 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53343365279 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528455284553 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 386.1 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6205979665 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.833333333 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268735027752 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098384998643 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112424315718 0.071462118173 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184374960592 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412773090619 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 82.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 74.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.