People usually mix their private and professional life. What are the pros and cons of this?
Recently, the phenomenon of people usually mix their private and professional life and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that mixing private and professional life by individuals can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, combining professional life with personal life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon is correlated negatively with accordingly complicated procedures.
Within the realm of a public arena, a person's private life might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of people's professional life far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-12 | minapolo | 88 | view |
| 2018-06-12 | mojtaba1980 | 79 | view |
| 2018-06-05 | Mehdi.Babaie | 88 | view |
| 2018-06-03 | bashirheidari | 85 | view |
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 88
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree?OrShould government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of p 79
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 88
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- What are the different methods students using to achieve information? Online materials, asking teachers or discussing with classmates? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f a public arena, a persons private life might increase the consequences of criti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79282868526 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28686949169 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661354581673 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3878198629 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.181818182 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276770866639 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970681761182 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111077351181 0.071462118173 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153701892461 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102917279722 0.0609392437508 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.14 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.