People usually mix their private and professional life. What are the pros and cons of this?
Recently, mixing the professional and private life has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the pros and cons of this?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, professional life is bound up inextricably with carrier life, which indicates it leads to both working hour and office management. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between job experience and hard-working characteristic as well as an exponential increase in social respectively. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of private life is correlated positively with not only leisure activity but also family time.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, mixing carrier life and personal life attribute to unhealthy life style, in that it would come down to more depression, anxiety, and stress. A salient example of such attribution is academic jobs, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take remote learning education for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint ignorance of individual features and personal habits and problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to long time working, not playing with children, and even family expenditure is. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of convenience and relaxation in modern life.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the drawbacks of mixing the professional and private life are far outweigh its benefits. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-12 | minapolo | 88 | view |
| 2018-06-12 | mojtaba1980 | 79 | view |
| 2018-06-05 | Mehdi.Babaie | 88 | view |
| 2018-06-03 | bashirheidari | 85 | view |
- benefits and problems of studying and performing the old play in high school. 11
- People can perform everyday tasks, such as shopping and banking as well as business transactions, without meeting other people face-to-face because of technology.What are the effects of this on individual and society as a whole? 88
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change 88
- Students should be required to stay in school until the age of eighteen . To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. 80
- Any new technological development in the recent years is a boon or curse for the society in general 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From a general standpoint, professional ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure activity but also family time. Within the realm of psychology, without ...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce and relaxation in modern life. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 307.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63843648208 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13050160817 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651465798046 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5881732073 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.153846154 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276852027691 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807042742023 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951641270566 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163443796151 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854260570047 0.0609392437508 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.