People who are famous entertainers or sportspeople should give up the right to privacy, because this is the price of fame. To what extent do you agree/disagree with this point of view? Give your opinion with your experiences.
Recently, the phenomenon of the privacy of famous entertainers and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of sportspeople is highly beneficial, such as issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that giving up the right to privacy can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, famous people can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of the price of fame as well as having a private life are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of privacy for famous people. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both being famous and private apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, celebrities might increase the consequences of the right of having privacy. Moreover, fundamental aspects of paying cost for being famous could relate to this reality the demerits of being entertainers pertain to being athletes. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of private lives is correlated negatively with the price of fame. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this attitude.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of being famous artists far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the worth of having private life prove the significance of the price of fame, but also pinpoint remarkable implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36194029851 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08827890337 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600746268657 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7603940391 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218002720401 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702092409654 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448677227688 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121041199774 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03606291538 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.