In the cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?
Recently, the phenomenon of cashless society and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of different types of bank cards is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the bank transaction could be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, credit cards can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of using credit cards, as well as debit cards, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered increasing your credits in the society. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both technologies and advanced societies apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the payment by bank cards might increase the consequences of paying by cash. Moreover, fundamental aspects of coins could relate to this reality that the demerits of money pertain to being dangerous. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of having lots of cash is correlated negatively with stealing. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the first humans.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of using credit cards instead of cash far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of having bank account prove the significance of keeping safe your money, but also pinpoint numerous implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38721804511 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05406879386 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646616541353 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7880731257 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.416666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20547171907 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595290115513 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519665147404 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106092866166 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03788273614 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.