Imitating celebrities in sports and movies is good or bad?

Essay topics:

Imitating celebrities in sports and movies is good or bad?

Surely there has been no time in history where the people have changed dramatically. A quick reflection on the typical day revels imitating lifestyle has been one of the prominent topics on contemporary discussion. People have been intrigued to analyze and explain whether it is good or bad for common man. I will elaborate this nation in further paragraph.
To begin with, there are myriad merits of celebrities. The first and foremost that all of celebrities and artists doing hard work for their success and become rich or get more followers. Furthermore, People set their ideal as role model. Moreover, the other thing is that they healthier their lifestyle. If a superstar gives up his smoking and alcohol drinking habits, then his followers would benefit from abandoning these bad habits as well.
Nonetheless, like two sides of the same coin, imitating celebrities also creates many problems. The most obvious negative impact may be a degrading society. This is due to the fact that not all celebrities are of good conduct, well-behaved and has a healthy lifestyle.
To conclude, people should stop to follow the bad habits of celebrities. Celebrities do not show their bad videos. Because it is bad impression of individuals

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lebrities do not show their bad videos. Because it is bad impression of individuals
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ause it is bad impression of individuals
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, well, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 31.9359605911 63% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 1207.87684729 86% => OK
No of words: 202.0 242.827586207 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12871287129 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84969690902 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673267326733 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 379.143842365 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.5024630542 63% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5023076104 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.0666666667 104.977214359 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4666666667 20.9669160288 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227558247585 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064990678365 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650544904573 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135099090642 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058690984615 0.0609392437508 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 12.6369458128 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.9458128079 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.3980295567 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 55.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.