Problem and benefits for high school study plays and work of theatres written centuries ago.
Surely there has been mo time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection in typically day revels problem and benefits for high school study plays and work of theatres written centuries ago has been one of the prominent topics in the contemporary discussion people have always been intrigued to analyze and explain
There are certain benefits and drawback of learning old theater play in schools. On one side, we can learn old culture through the plays wills on opposite side this play can prevent us from learning modern play and culture. This essay will discuss about positive and negative side of this approach with relevant example.
On positive side, old theater play is main entity that still preserved ancient culture and heritage. So, by learning this plays in high schools, we can get vital information about our ancestors and their lifestyle. Such information is critical in case if we want to pass our heritage next generation. The ancient culture and heritage shows the thinking ability of ancient people.
On the negative side, even through this plays are full of information about our culture and traditions; they often misguide students as our ancestors lived in the superstitious world. Therefore, students try to copy some of wrong traditions into the life and can destroy their carrier. For example, in ancient time there was a sati movement which is negative effect on people in this time.
In conclusion, old theaters plays show negative and positive side of our history and it is up to students and their parents to choose which side they want to follow.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 36, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...le. On the negative side, even through this plays are full of information about our...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02222222222 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53708840175 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.6408943557 50.4703680194 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.25397266985 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215370212551 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066099690255 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12959569709 0.071462118173 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11694164944 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12470710283 0.0609392437508 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.94827586207 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.