Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience.
Old buildings are deemed as a landmark and as an identity for any nation, which in turn ensure growth and prosperity in some form or the other. However, some advocate the view that the government should restore old buildings by spending huge money, while others are against it. But, I partially accord with the statement.
To begin with, old architecture is considered as a masterpiece, which has made many researchers to ponder about path breaking architecture, therefore it is crucial to rebuild these old buildings on account of multifarious reasons. First and foremost, old buildings are the center of attraction for the tourists, thereby tourism promotes at a rapid pace, which in turn creates many opportunities for the local people in terms of employment, development and so on, which is the most noteworthy reason. On the top of that, old buildings are the silent story teller, which reveal various valuable information about the past events to the new generation, which is again very fruitful for the young minds in knowing the roots of their country’s culture and civilization. For instance, it has been seen that old buildings ensure prosperity and recognition for any country around the world.
However, change is the inevitable part and it should be assimilated as per the requirement of time, and hence spending of money can be proved regressive for any country owing to plethora reasons. Firstly, there are many old buildings, which are on the brink of collapse, consequently it may prove catastrophic for the people who are residing nearby those buildings. In addition, some buildings have a harsh stories, which are utterly brutal and immoral and thus, it can be a major cause of agony for a certain group of people or religion. As a result, such building should be transformed into a beautiful architecture for the people such as malls, supermarkets and many more, thereby it will be fruitful for the economy as well as for the sentiments of the people.
In conclusion, I reckon that expenditure on old buildings is quite lucrative, but it should be done in a calculative manner by keeping the new innovations into consideration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Old buildings deemed as a landmark and as an identity ...
^^
Line 3, column 786, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and civilization. For instance, it has seen that old buildings make sure prospe...
^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le part and it should assimilated as per requirement of time, and hence spending ...
^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'story'?
Suggestion: story
...n addition, some buildings have a harsh stories, which are utterly brutal and immoral a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have done' or 'do'?
Suggestion: have done; do
...dings is quite lucrative, but it should done in a calculation way by keeping the new...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as for, for instance, i reckon, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1207.87684729 147% => OK
No of words: 348.0 242.827586207 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1091954023 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 3.92707691288 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98781490689 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 379.143842365 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.0355520828 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.166666667 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.9669160288 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.5833333333 7.25397266985 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212006299241 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846024784507 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043065035747 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133589675365 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253369916533 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.1260098522 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.