As a result of tourism, many historical buildings and sites are being damaged beyond repair.
What could be done to prevent this?
The importance of preserving the most recognized places as a historical patrimony for humankind was always debatable but now has become controversial. The crucial influence of tourism has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the unrepairable problems caused because of this exploration in recent years. It can be agreed that opening historical buildings for visit has caused some issues, but some people claim that there are some solutions that could be implemented in order to prevent these problems as well. This essay will elaborate on how to overcome this damage and thus lead to a logical solution.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the exaggerated tourism can bring consequences for the continuity of the historical sites, but most prominent ones stem from the fact that the responsible does not stipulate a maximum number of people to visit the place in defined hours per day. For instance, they try to get the most from everyone without calculating the consequences for such a desire.
Approaches to deal with problems of overcrowded places are numerous, but an effective way to deal with this is by charging the visit in order to supply financial resources to preserve the place and try to avoid the larger damage. In addition, the government should ensure fiscalization and proper control of the area, and make campaigns in order to extend conscience of the individuals who want to visit the buildings and other monumental important places.
Based on the arguments outlined above, the government should play a more effective role to defend the historical buildings and avoid future problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19475655431 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85348035777 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580524344569 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7310846138 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.111111111 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 20.9669160288 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177354292133 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652866584129 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585717278281 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910563022403 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843659700896 0.0609392437508 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.