Regulating drivers' on road behaviour is an ongoing social issue. Typically, governments enforce good driving standards by penalising bad drivers and fining them. This, however, is not the only way to improve people's driving skills; governments can also incentive safe driving through rewards. This essay will discuss why both penalty and reward need to be used.
Left to their own devices, people would break the law, including road laws. There is no doubt that people would speed, cut other drivers off and perform and array of dangerous driving behaviours. Enforcing safe driving through financial disincentives contributs to safe driving and fewer fatalities. Overall, it is an important and effective way to regular driving.
Offering incentives to safe drivers who do not drive radically is an excellent idea that would also contribute to safer roads. Often, safe drivers do not feel that they are recognised for their efforts; they are the silent majority. An example of an reward could be financial, or that they are recognised in their local community. Having incentives in addition to penalties would greatly improve road safety standards.
This essay argues that both rewards and penalties is the key to improving people's safety while driving. In my opinion, the government should instantiate both of these rules to make our roads safer for everyone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... are the silent majority. An example of an reward could be financial, or that they...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, while, in addition, no doubt, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 31.9359605911 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34259259259 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64417923247 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615740740741 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.9693654104 50.4703680194 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.4285714286 104.977214359 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4285714286 20.9669160288 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243633366058 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822518633582 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048960753003 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149035963864 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293887343669 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.1260098522 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 61.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.