Role Model for Youngsters
Recently, the phenomenon of looking up the cherished stars as a role model and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that inspiring young generation is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I inclined to believe that youngsters' admiration can be a pulse, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
From the sociological standpoint, shaping up the life of youngsters can provide the society with some noticeable effect which is rooted in the fact that identifying the right career, as well as getting the reward of success, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the source of inspiration and standing as a motivation. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both virtuous character and facing hardship apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychological science, following blindly might increase the consequence of the destruction of ethical values. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of violence, crime, unsuccessful and lavish lifestyle and also immoral acts relate to this reality that demerits of influencing innocent followers pertain to the negative role. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of following a footstep of a favorite idol is correlated negatively with not having a significant academic education. Hence, it is correct to presume preconceived notion of an ideal role model.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of imitating role models far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of emerging as a good example for youth prove the significance of it, but also pinpoint derogatory role implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-04 | Bipin kandel | 72 | view |
| 2020-12-19 | santhip123 | 77 | view |
| 2020-03-13 | gurlal sandhu | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'youngsters'' or 'youngster's'?
Suggestion: youngsters'; youngster's
...individuals. I inclined to believe that youngsters admiration can be a pulse, and I will a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, look, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54421768707 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26463995472 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 139.433497537 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659863945578 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6064164831 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.833333333 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244703570551 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711814070993 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731553943718 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126360666143 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665953840167 0.0609392437508 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.11 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 55.0591133005 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.