successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters.agree/disagree?
Nowadays, the important of sports and movies are one of the critical issues that has been discussed all over the world. There is a widespread belief that the successful athletics and the glamorous movies stars are the role model for adolescence. I opined with this statement because they are the reason for self motivation.
To begin with, sports and movies has indeed attracted the attention of millions of people around the globe. People are spending more time in front of TV screen to watch their best-loved athletics program and the movies. Youngsters see daily work done by sports stars and they try to do some athletic ate home, this seems really inspiring.
Another aspect of my point of view is that film stars plays admiring roles in movies. For instance, sharukh khan, a famous actor play the different motivating roles on various movies. This sets a good example for young people. These should be the supported and praise for youngsters.
Some people believe that athletics and actor have negative influence on adolescence because teenager spend more time on copying the lifestyle of actor and sports star rather than focusing on their own profession.
It is obvious that, many teenagers are fully inspired with the successful story of movies actor and sports stars.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, really, so, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 1207.87684729 89% => OK
No of words: 212.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06603773585 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46865360531 2.71678728327 91% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622641509434 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 379.143842365 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7591162264 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 7.25397266985 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305430560279 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103410065357 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103834557643 0.071462118173 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148328946958 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716849081344 0.0609392437508 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.1260098522 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 55.0591133005 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.