Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion
Recently, selecting students according to their abilities has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "does schools select students with the same academic abilities?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, academic performance is bound up inextricably with overall grade, which indicates it leads to both mental ability and human capacity. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between academic study and personal experience as well as an exponential increase in knowledge. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of course syllabus is correlated positively with not only traditional assessment but also examination booklet.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, individuals attribute to different abilities, in that it would come down to creativity, team working, and supportive behavior. A salient example of such attribution is best student, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take decision making for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint student’s discrimination problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to oral exam, modern teaching methods, and even incorrect evaluation. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of rich experiences in grouping.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the drawbacks of it far outweigh its benefits. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the education standpoint, academic ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment but also examination booklet. Within the realm of psychology, without ...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 227, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
.... A salient example of such attribution is best student, which is a cause for concern s...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of rich experiences in grouping. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, of course, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90175438596 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25071008177 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701754385965 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1014031771 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.384615385 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222242249851 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615301816799 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064056820868 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120690618935 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827353006122 0.0609392437508 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.22 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 55.0591133005 214% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.