Should governments build more road to allow more vehicle owner or improve the public transport?
It is indubitable that the phenomenon of road congestion in the modern world is highly controversial with many people claiming that the government and local authorities should improve the road networks for local people. However, I firmly believe that this would cause more chaos and pollution levels and should rather improve the public transport systems. This essay will further elaborate on both sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are various persuasive arguments for building road networks. Firstly, building more roads in cities and rural areas would improve the local infrastructure and boosts the economy of the nation. Secondly, availability of improved road networks and flyovers would increase the connectivity of places for local people and distance would no longer be a barrier for travel. However, this would cause more road congestions and increased pollution. Nevertheless, governments should build roads to provide faster, easier and convenient access to places.
On the other hand, people who argue in favour of public transportation balance their arguments on the detrimental effects of increased traffic congestion and peaking pollution due to an upsurge in the number of vehicles. The effective solution for this is to offer an extensive public transport system in form of metros, trains and buses with frequent timetables, better access and improved availability. This would provide the local people with a cheaper, convenient and a safe way to travel to their work and home.
In view of the arguments mentioned above, it is concluded that it is far better to have a good public transport system than to build road networks which would affect the environment badly and increase chaos for vehicle owners.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-14 | meenutalwar | 77 | view |
- Nowadays, TV has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news & awareness and for some it acts like a companion. What is your opinion about this? 72
- Any recent invention that you think has proved detrimental or beneficial to society? 11
- Do you think that formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledge at school? 80
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree? 80
- What are the positive and negative effects of today’s communication? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts for building road networks. Firstly, building more roads in cities and rural ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35611510791 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78692491259 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532374100719 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2867898807 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.083333333 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314601279675 0.242375264174 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121538979074 0.0925447433944 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802318028639 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190199877 0.151781067708 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747357372572 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.