Should teenagers be allowed to make decisions? Agree or not
The importance of teenagers taking decisions which were always contentious has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is highly beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of increase crime has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will letter elaborate for reasons my favoring effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most predominant one's stems from the fact that teenagers do not have more experience as compared to seniors. As a well-known example, the proportion of teenagers taking a decision has increased from merely 5 percent to 10 percent. As a result, they can make rash decisions. Another pivotal aspect is that they cannot find solutions to solve any problem.
Moreover, teenagers do not interest in home activities because children are always busy in studies and other skills, consequently, they cannot take big decisions quickly than adults. In addition, teenagers can easily misguide from others. Hence, it is apparent why many are against teenagers ought not to be allowed to making the decisions.
According to the arguments aforementioned above one can reach a conclusion that the drawbacks of teenagers to be allowed to make decisions too dire to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in addition, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28085106383 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81371535785 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634042553191 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2746486252 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.416666667 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269537587356 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981415371005 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100157367188 0.071462118173 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190572145122 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10025960832 0.0609392437508 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.