Elections are one of the most complicated and essential part of our society. Some countries oblige their citizens to vote while others allow flexibility and give their citizens the right to choose. In this essay, I would like to elaborate further on why countries should force their citizens to vote.
Firstly, most countries allow their citizens to choose whether they are going to vote or not to vote. They allow this flexibility especially in democratic countries where the people can decide whether they participate in the elections or not and this strengthens their ability to choose. For example, a study shows that democratic nations who allowed freedom to vote enabled their citizens to choose better leaders. Thus, there is some merit in allowing citizens to think for themselves and choose whether to join the elections or not.
Secondly and more importantly, compulsory voting in elections may be able to produce better election results. Because everyone is forced to vote, elections can better capture the wishes and thoughts of their people on whom they think is their rightful leader. For example, statistical evidence show that elections with the highest turn out of voters are more reliable and credible. This means that compulsory voting is effective in ensuring good election results.
In conclusion, this essay discussed why and why not compulsory voting is beneficial to society. Elections provide opportunities to citizens to exercise their freedom to choose and to maximize its effects, all citizens should vote. In my opinion, countries should start enforcing compulsory voting to improve election results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... the freedom to choose eventually chose better leaders because they have always been g...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33460076046 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68500838895 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501901140684 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.86956287 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.214285714 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232966714168 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105527862049 0.0925447433944 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682442802682 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16943439737 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369057332483 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.