In some countries the quality of life in large cities is declining ?why do you think this is happening ? what measures can be taken to stop it ?
In major Cities the quality of life is declining due to construction of buildings and developing the technological needs for the modern environment but not using the adequate need foragriculture and vegetation area of land required which is a basic need for humans to live on food.
Modern technology is controlled by computers and machines which is used in manufacturing and developing new modes of accessibility. Due to major incomes from investors and real estate projects advancing to newer improving tech of designing complex structures. Farming and agriculture goes in vain to the farmers who cultivate food for us, and thereby no importance is given in that sector.
Pollution and population is also on the rise with people from rural areas are entering into the urban areas for better job opportunities and salaries of a common man.The congestion in peak hours of traffic causes pollution and cutting down of trees for expansion of roads and construction purposes causes environmental damage to humanlife itself which is not considered as a major cause of health problems and new diseases is developed from these things.
In conclusion, the quality of life depends on the adequate use of natural resource and finding improved methods to improvise the environmental conditions with proper measures taken into account.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ortunities and salaries of a common man.The congestion in peak hours of traffic cau...
^^^
Line 13, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd finding improved methods to improvise the environmental conditions with proper...
^^
Line 13, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith proper measures taken into account.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, as for, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 20.9802955665 19% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 211.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40758293839 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05644950972 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620853080569 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6551724138 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.5024630542 171% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 118.287432412 50.4703680194 234% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 190.166666667 104.977214359 181% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.1666666667 20.9669160288 168% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0662421205162 0.242375264174 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330867458215 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477326679104 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0496301187323 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509564698245 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 12.6369458128 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.49 53.1260098522 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.9458128079 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.3980295567 154% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.