Some organizations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this.
In most organizations, employees are encouraged to give opinions and contribution in decision making process of company’s products and services. This essay will examine the benefits and drawbacks of this management strategy.
Engaging employees in the decision making process creates an open organizational structure. The structure allows for a free flow of information and utilization of the staffs experience. As employees are directly in touch with customers and other stakeholders, they are more likely to come up with an instant and practical solution to any arisen problem. An open organizational structure encourages employees to contribute their opinions and improve the overall performance of the organizations.
However, this management strategy may be impractical for large-sized organizations. In order to make the strategy works, top – level managers need to constantly update and be very open for discussion. A simple organizational structure or effective communication method is also necessary so that the voice of employees can be heard and applied effectively. These are great challenges to large scale organizations. In fact, these companies always establish certain procedures and administrative processes to maintain their own standard quality. As a result, when employees’ idea reaches the managers and final decision is made, it is no longer an effective solution.
To conclude, although a well-organized structure is required to effectively engage employees in the decision making process, getting employees involved in such process helps to improve to the final products and services.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, so, well, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86075949367 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44327582532 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590717299578 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3240527807 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.846153846 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2307692308 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 7.25397266985 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259137481289 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897347456282 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840725217123 0.071462118173 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185911074241 0.151781067708 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694103929032 0.0609392437508 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 53.1260098522 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 10.9458128079 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.