Should University penalize students for late submission of their work?
At university, students are commonly assessed through individual or group assignments. Some people think that penalty due to late submission is reasonable while others argue that it is not necessary. This essay will argue that although such punishment is strict and imposes pressure on students, it is mandatory to do so.
To begin with, due date requires students to manage their time effectively and avoid procrastination. Penalty is an effective way to gain students commitment on submitting the tasks on time. For instance, while working on multiple projects at the same time, students are self – control on their timetable. To avoid losing marks, they are more likely to plan their schedule and assign a reasonable amount of time for the task. By meeting the deadlines, students demonstrate good time management strategy.
By exerting pressure on students, universities prepare them for future workforce and educate them to employ available resources to accomplish a given task. In fact, most universities develop a large resource to assist students. There are supporting services such as workshop in writing essay, computer lab demonstration and math or statistic workshop. Furthermore, students are free to discuss with each other or their professors. Thus, by employing these study aids, there is no reason that students cannot complete their task on time.
To conclude, this essay has argued that students should receive penalties when they fail to submit their assignment on time. Such punishment ensures students commitment on sufficiently using all available resources offered by university to carry out the given task efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts cannot complete their task on time. To conclude, this essay has argued that ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, thus, while, for instance, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47450980392 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92583186776 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63137254902 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7167060013 50.4703680194 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.0666666667 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290301956285 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885227423652 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532331036963 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155952825437 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390908399202 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.