There are more men or women in certain jobs and there’s nothing we can change about it. Do you agree with that?
The idea that there are more men or women in certain jobs, and there is nothing we can change about it, which lies among arguable debates, has again sparked controversy. Some proponents maintain that there are jobs that favours a specific gender than the other, while opponents claim that we should try to get gender-balancing in jobs. This essay will put both sides of the continuous issues under scrutiny, hence arrive at a conclusion.
To begin with, there is a myriad of reasons that some jobs are only suitable for a specific gender. However, the most evident one is derived from the fact that the nature of some jobs is either physically or mentally more fit for a gender. For instance, the gentle nature of women helps them to easily finish tasks like dealing with young children or patients, while men’s muscular gives them more advantages in labour works. Whilst there is no fixed rule, these characteristics make the employer tend to hire more of a particular gender that generally fit the job’s requirement.
Moving on to consider the opposing arguments put forward by critics, some people believe that men and women have the same working capability, so there should be more gender-balancing in jobs selection. It is largely attributed to the fact that many works which mostly thought to be only be done by men in the past, were proven to be nicely completed by women. An instance illustrating this idea is that Marie Curie, who won Nobel Prize for physics at a time when science was dominated by men. Likewise, women have been able to conquer the sky, mountains and seas, as well as men, despite the lack of strength in general.
In summary, despite both sides having valid and logical arguments, a final conclusion must be drawn, and I am deeply convinced that gender neutrality is important, and both men and women can perform jobs as well as the others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ur works. Whilst there is no fixed rule, these characteristics make the employer ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, likewise, so, well, while, for instance, in general, in summary, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 5.94088669951 252% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 323.0 242.827586207 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83281733746 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60606829977 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 139.433497537 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600619195046 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.632085966 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.083333333 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9166666667 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.25397266985 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287255757403 0.242375264174 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984333224517 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896701501157 0.071462118173 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163585321905 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549857540945 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.1260098522 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.